<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching For A New Digital Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/</link>
	<description>100% of your daily recommended intake of awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4875</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4875</guid>
		<description>Well I just obtained a Canon EOS 350D, yea I know its not compact but I&#039;ve been using the Canon A85 or something previously? Again not as compact but it is getting smaller.

My little sister has one of those Sony Cybershots, I forget the exact model but its not much bigging than a credit card and has a good sized LCD screen (takes up pretty much the entire back of the camera) I friend at work has the model above and she loves it too.

I&#039;m more of a Canon fan though, Sony&#039;s seem to like to use proprietary USB cables and I hate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I just obtained a Canon EOS 350D, yea I know its not compact but I&#8217;ve been using the Canon A85 or something previously? Again not as compact but it is getting smaller.</p>
<p>My little sister has one of those Sony Cybershots, I forget the exact model but its not much bigging than a credit card and has a good sized LCD screen (takes up pretty much the entire back of the camera) I friend at work has the model above and she loves it too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more of a Canon fan though, Sony&#8217;s seem to like to use proprietary USB cables and I hate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4590</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4590</guid>
		<description>Just looked at the M30 today at London Drugs, it comes in navy blue, mmmmm.  It&#039;s tiny, 7.1 megpix, a slew of features and takes great pics.  Only $279.  I&#039;m thinking about getting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just looked at the M30 today at London Drugs, it comes in navy blue, mmmmm.  It&#8217;s tiny, 7.1 megpix, a slew of features and takes great pics.  Only $279.  I&#8217;m thinking about getting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msdanielle</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4549</link>
		<dc:creator>msdanielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4549</guid>
		<description>i agree. i think you should definitely go with Canon. i bought a powershot SD600 from walmart for $250 + 1gb memory for $50. here&#039;s the link to the exact camera:
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&amp;fcategoryid=145&amp;modelid=12913

best benefits: it&#039;s really compact, has a huge lcd screen, it&#039;s easy to use, has 6 megapixels, and 3x optical zoon. i bought it really last minute a couple days before my trip to bali and when i came back everyone kept going on and on about how i take such great photos. ya right, i didn&#039;t tell em i had a canon. ;) i wouldn&#039;t go with sony, i hear they have problems with their lenses. but check dpreview.com, they prob have the best reviews. sorry for such a long comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. i think you should definitely go with Canon. i bought a powershot SD600 from walmart for $250 + 1gb memory for $50. here&#8217;s the link to the exact camera:<br />
<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&amp;fcategoryid=145&amp;modelid=12913" rel="nofollow">http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&amp;fcategoryid=145&amp;modelid=12913</a></p>
<p>best benefits: it&#8217;s really compact, has a huge lcd screen, it&#8217;s easy to use, has 6 megapixels, and 3x optical zoon. i bought it really last minute a couple days before my trip to bali and when i came back everyone kept going on and on about how i take such great photos. ya right, i didn&#8217;t tell em i had a canon. <img src='http://www.ededition.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  i wouldn&#8217;t go with sony, i hear they have problems with their lenses. but check dpreview.com, they prob have the best reviews. sorry for such a long comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonix</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4495</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve an old fujitsu KX with 2.0 megapixel :(
In the next days i must gain some corage and do an upgrade to a better digital camera. I liked your review and this one could be my next camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve an old fujitsu KX with 2.0 megapixel <img src='http://www.ededition.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
In the next days i must gain some corage and do an upgrade to a better digital camera. I liked your review and this one could be my next camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gdog</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4477</link>
		<dc:creator>Gdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4477</guid>
		<description>My first compact digital camera was a Canon S230 digital elph. I&#039;ve so far experienced the S400 and now the SD400. The Canon&#039;s size and picture quality (along with excellent, high fps video) is superb. Like Carl said, they just feel right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first compact digital camera was a Canon S230 digital elph. I&#8217;ve so far experienced the S400 and now the SD400. The Canon&#8217;s size and picture quality (along with excellent, high fps video) is superb. Like Carl said, they just feel right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very happy with my old Optio S (fits in an Altoids box).  Great picture quality and easy to use in a compact size. Anything in the optio line is good for point and click uses. The new M series is nice too, and all priced under $300.
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/pentax-optio-m30_reviews.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very happy with my old Optio S (fits in an Altoids box).  Great picture quality and easy to use in a compact size. Anything in the optio line is good for point and click uses. The new M series is nice too, and all priced under $300.<br />
<a href="http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/pentax-optio-m30_reviews.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/digital-cameras/pentax-optio-m30_reviews.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>I have a Panasonic FX9.  It has a &quot;FOOD&quot; mode.  Nuff said ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Panasonic FX9.  It has a &#8220;FOOD&#8221; mode.  Nuff said <img src='http://www.ededition.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kwan</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4434</guid>
		<description>My girlfriend&#039;s brother has one of those slim Sony cameras and the picture quality isn&#039;t great nor is the user interface. I&#039;ve heard good things about the Panasonic Lumix line.

FYI, most consumer point-and-shoots will have 3x optical zoom. No more, no less. A small handful may have 4x or 5x, but by and large, you&#039;re looking at 3x.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My girlfriend&#8217;s brother has one of those slim Sony cameras and the picture quality isn&#8217;t great nor is the user interface. I&#8217;ve heard good things about the Panasonic Lumix line.</p>
<p>FYI, most consumer point-and-shoots will have 3x optical zoom. No more, no less. A small handful may have 4x or 5x, but by and large, you&#8217;re looking at 3x.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-4432</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/searching-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-4432</guid>
		<description>I did research on this before buying a Canon Digital IXY 900 IS. I wanted something small, with plenty of manual settings, and good optical IS. This camera is called Digital Elph 800 IS or something in North America.

Others I looked at were the FinePix Z5.. This one doesn&#039;t have optical IS, but it has a really good sensor that allows high ISO without looking like crap, so ends up being good in low light as well.

All Nikon cameras in this size/price range suck, so forget about them.

Panasonic has a new camera in this range with optical IS, but it wasn&#039;t out when I was looking, so I don&#039;t know much about  it.

Honestly, just stick with the Canon... It just feels right ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did research on this before buying a Canon Digital IXY 900 IS. I wanted something small, with plenty of manual settings, and good optical IS. This camera is called Digital Elph 800 IS or something in North America.</p>
<p>Others I looked at were the FinePix Z5.. This one doesn&#8217;t have optical IS, but it has a really good sensor that allows high ISO without looking like crap, so ends up being good in low light as well.</p>
<p>All Nikon cameras in this size/price range suck, so forget about them.</p>
<p>Panasonic has a new camera in this range with optical IS, but it wasn&#8217;t out when I was looking, so I don&#8217;t know much about  it.</p>
<p>Honestly, just stick with the Canon&#8230; It just feels right <img src='http://www.ededition.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
