<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Studio 60 vs. 30 Rock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ededition.com/studio-60-vs-30-rock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ededition.com/studio-60-vs-30-rock/</link>
	<description>100% of your daily recommended intake of awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/studio-60-vs-30-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/studio-60-vs-30-rock/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Update: You inspired me to put up a post of my own. Check it out here:

&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2006/11/18/studio-60-losing-steam.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Beyond the Rhetoric: Studio 60 losing steam?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: You inspired me to put up a post of my own. Check it out here:</p>
<p><b><a href="http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2006/11/18/studio-60-losing-steam.aspx" rel="nofollow">Beyond the Rhetoric: Studio 60 losing steam?</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ededition.com/studio-60-vs-30-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ededition.com/studio-60-vs-30-rock/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I agree that Studio 60 is head and shoulders above 30 Rock. Although the &quot;let&#039;s walk very quickly down a hallway while discussing something reasonably important and making some tongue-in-cheek comments&quot; can get a little tiring at times, the dialogue -- in general -- is absolutely amazing in this show. By comparison, 30 Rock isn&#039;t all that funny, even though it is a distinct &lt;i&gt;comedy&lt;/i&gt;, whereas Studio 60 is more of a &lt;i&gt;drama&lt;/i&gt; with some subtle humor thrown in. Fans of Studio 60 should also check out Sports Night, also by Aaron Sorkin. It was a short lived show depicting a behind the scenes look at a nightly sportscast a la ESPN Sportscenter. Available on DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Studio 60 is head and shoulders above 30 Rock. Although the &#8220;let&#8217;s walk very quickly down a hallway while discussing something reasonably important and making some tongue-in-cheek comments&#8221; can get a little tiring at times, the dialogue &#8212; in general &#8212; is absolutely amazing in this show. By comparison, 30 Rock isn&#8217;t all that funny, even though it is a distinct <i>comedy</i>, whereas Studio 60 is more of a <i>drama</i> with some subtle humor thrown in. Fans of Studio 60 should also check out Sports Night, also by Aaron Sorkin. It was a short lived show depicting a behind the scenes look at a nightly sportscast a la ESPN Sportscenter. Available on DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
